EVOLUTION OF ECONOMIC SECURITY CONCEPTS UNDER HYBRID THREATS
Abstract
The article examines the evolution of economic security concepts under the growing influence of hybrid threats that combine economic, geopolitical, informational, and institutional instruments. It argues that the emergence of hybrid threats has fundamentally altered the analytical environment in which economic security is defined, assessed, and governed, rendering traditional stability-oriented and sector-specific interpretations increasingly insufficient. The study traces the conceptual transformation of economic security from early state-centered and protection-oriented approaches toward broader systemic and adaptive frameworks. It is shown that classical interpretations, which emphasized protection from external economic pressure and preservation of macroeconomic stability, were developed in relatively predictable environments and therefore inadequately capture the complexity of contemporary threats. Hybrid threats operate through indirect, non-transparent, and often non-linear mechanisms, blurring the boundaries between economic risk, political pressure, and security challenges. Particular attention is devoted to the role of uncertainty as a defining characteristic of hybrid threat environments. Unlike conventional economic risks, hybrid threats are not fully observable or quantifiable and often exploit institutional weaknesses, informational asymmetries, and structural interdependencies within economic systems. As a result, economic security increasingly depends not only on the prevention of shocks but on the capacity of economic systems to adapt, absorb disturbances, and maintain functionality under persistent pressure. The study further highlights the limitations of traditional risk-based and indicator-driven analytical models in capturing the complexity of economic security under hybrid threats. In response, the article emphasizes the growing relevance of adaptive, scenario-based, and system-oriented frameworks capable of addressing uncertainty, cascading effects, and cross-sectoral interactions. The findings provide a foundation for further empirical research and support the development of economic security policies that move beyond financial stabilization toward comprehensive resilience and adaptive governance in crisis-prone and geopolitically fragmented environments.
References
Bank for International Settlements (2018). Global liquidity: changing instrument and currency patterns. Basel, Switzerland: BIS. P.11. Available at: https://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt1809b.pdf
Bernstein, P. L. (1996). Against the gods: The remarkable story of risk. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons. P. 396 Available at: https://matrixtrainings.wordpress.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/against-the-gods-the-remarkable-story-of-risk-1996-peter-l-bernstein.pdf
Buzan B. (1983). People, states and fear: The national security problem in international relations. Brighton, UK: Wheatsheaf Books. P. 280.
Callahan G. (2008). Nassim Nicholas Taleb: The black swan: The impact of the highly improbable. The Review of Austrian Economics. No. 21(4). pp. 361-364. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11138-008-0051-7
Chaffin B., Gosnell H., Cosens B. (2014). A decade of adaptive governance scholarship: Synthesis and future directions. Ecology and Society. Vol. 19. art. 56. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06824-190356
European Central Bank (2020). Financial stability review. Frankfurt am Main, Germany: ECB. P. 141. Available at: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/pub/pdf/fsr/ecb.fsr202011~b7be9ae1f1.en.pdf
Galbraith J. (2015). The New Industrial State. The New Industrial State. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctvcm4hjz
Knight F. H. (1921). Risk, uncertainty and profit. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin. P. 445. Available at: https://fraser.stlouisfed.org/files/docs/publications/books/risk/riskuncertaintyprofit.pdf
Leiss W., Beck U., Ritter M., Lash S., Wynne B. (1995). Risk Society, Towards a New Modernity. Canadian Journal of Sociology / Cahiers canadiens de sociologie. Volume 19, No. 4. pp. 544-547. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3341155
Minsky H. P. (1986). Stabilizing an unstable economy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press. P. 407. Available at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/336150130_STABILIZING_AN_UNSTABLE_ECONOMY_MINSKY
Multilateral Organisation Performance Assessment Network (MOPAN), (2021), MOPAN Assessment Report: ILO 2020 Assessment Cycle, Paris. P. 224. Available at: https://www.mopan.org/content/dam/mopan/en/publications/our-work/evidence/ilo/ilo-2021/mopan-ilo-assessment-report-2021.pdf
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2019). Economic resilience and security. Paris, France: OECD Publishing. Available at: https://www.oecd.org/en/publications/development-co-operation-report-2019_9a58c83f-en.html
United Nations Development Programme. (2021). STRATEGIC PLAN 2022-2025. New York, NY: UNDP. P. 9. Available at: https://www.undp.org/sites/g/files/zskgke326/files/2021-09/UNDP-Strategic-Plan-2022-2025_1.pdf
World Bank. (2025). Global economic prospects. Washington, DC: World Bank. P. 254. Available at: https://thedocs.worldbank.org/en/doc/8bf0b62ec6bcb886d97295ad930059e9-0050012025/original/GEP-June-2025.pdf
World Economic Forum. (2025). The global risks report 2025. Geneva, Switzerland: WEF. P. 104. Available at: https://reports.weforum.org/docs/WEF_Global_Risks_Report_2025.pdf





